Threshold should increase

If only 2000 multivariate salary income, that in Beijing, Shanghai, guangzhou such a line metropolitan life, should be very difficult. Needless to say the nonlocal census register, after graduation from the university in local people looking for work, it is the local household register, and local have house, need not rent crowd, that also is basically poor strata. So, 2000 yuan threshold is too low, it means that have not yet out of poverty have need to pay tax. How many suitable for that the point? 3000, 4000, 5000 yuan? Now look, the possibility of 3000 yuan, but if it is 3000 yuan I think is still low. If tried to through the consumption of domestic demand, the cutoff point amplified to 5000 yuan appropriate. For because, according to current price level, raising the cutoff point to 3000 yuan, the increase of the working class that the little income, I'm afraid I can't balance the rising price of loss. Of course, the government might say, working itself should also rise a bit. But the reality is, the raw material cost, environmental cost, the financial cost; the; The enterprise of "rigid cost", has been a big backlog the working such "flexibility," cost, and enterprise how many ability for NFL Jerseys employees a raise? So, the government at this time must play, not only for personal income increased can drive consumption of government targets and shall simultaneously consider raising threshold will also appropriate for enterprise reduced pressure.

Moreover, the government finance income increase speed has for 10 years in a row or national income more than GDP growth of more than two times, this needs financial future in quite a long time for the people for the enterprise. This is the inevitable requirement of economic structure adjustment. And a tax adjustment is an important breakthrough, and with its manifests the government "the power used for the sentiment for the people for the people are, the advantage seeks for the people," sincerity. From January 1, 2006 began to impose individual income tax, and sets the cutoff point for 1600 yuan since, now the adjustment is the second, first time occurs on March 1, 2008, the personal income tax from 1600 yuan threshold raised to 2000 yuan. In the second threshold adjustment, a very sharp questions was raised, is: threshold must be balanced fair principle. Then discuss two directions: first, shall be as a family unit to calculate average family income, and on the basis of individual income tax determined forehead; Second, the difference is very big in cost of living, according to the "one size fits all" if the way threshold set, certainly will not fair. In fact, now the two problems, without being resolved. This can even get part of the solution? Now also said that not clear. But at least people have such expectations. Chinese administration management department is always doing things like "one size fits all", this reflects Chinese administrative management CuFangXing, this also is in countries is one of the reasons for high administrative costs. In fact, fine taxation have plenty of mature experience abroad, from hardware to change is not difficult. But the difficulty is system, mechanism change to see "benefit association" willing to do in the true in. From 2008 to now, we see is the 3 years passed before tax revenue has a fine degree rise. But unfortunately, the fine basic is for "close" direction, whether is the enterprise or individual, want to tax evasion, difficulty is more and NBA Jerseys more big; But, in fairness to the direction anyway. For example, the government make the census, spent many human, financial and material resources. Such costs are in order to make clear the population? Is also clarified the Chinese family population? Clarified the family income status?