"Service for taxpayer" may not right!!!

Recently, a popular online police said 1 "taxpayers pay money has nothing to do with me" if, under the scariest. Some countries have public officials about this "taxpayer has nothing to do with me" thinking, have the place of discussion.dc hats But critics "taxpayer is food and clothing parents" logic does not necessarily natural right. Why should taxpayers pay taxes? After all, every member of society is to take up the social resources and according to the principle of proportion pay. High income, take up the social resources, so want pay tax also much; Low-income people, take up the social resources below the average level, so can pay less or not capture and even access to certain compensation. To pay taxes is compulsory, can't and right hook! The public service department for the whole society equal service members, is the code of conduct. And not only for the taxpayer service, and not for the taxpayer service. So, "service for taxpayer" and not just a perfectly correct statement.discount nfl jerseys There is a reason, the author not advocating the use of "service for taxpayer" slogan. Because, this slogan is easy to translate into public service designed for tax more plute people service theory basis. Of course, some might argue that, even if ratal is zero, also is the taxpayer. Also with some truth. But if so, why many a "taxpayer" concept, it directly use the "national" or "residents" concept.

see more:People and animals are equal rights?

In the world the most painful matter: people in card also in the money but not......